$213 million USD.
6 weeks in the top ten.
I had no idea.
$213 million USD.
6 weeks in the top ten.
I had no idea.
I think it benefited enormously from its release date. There was literally nothing going on when this movie came out.
Considering the costs, the domestic return wasn't good.The best market for studio films is still North America, because that's where the studios take the biggest cut.
It was also soft in bigger western markets that are usually good bets for American movies (Germany, France, the UK, Mexico).
Foreign box office is vastly overrated by Box Office Mojo and the trades, where they pretend every foreign ticket has the same value as an American one. They love to talk about big Chinese numbers, but never mention the studios might only see half of that projected box office, if that.
Massive distribution definitely saved this movie's ass, but bear in mind 5 years ago "Amazing Spider-man 2" posted similar numbers. Nobody talks about that movie as a success today.
This is the game now. It's pretty silly.
Can anyone find a solid answer to how many screens are in Asia? I know Aquaman killed over there, but I can't find the article now and I remember reading that it opened on like 40,000 screens or some insane number. Thats bonkers. I remember when opening on 2,000 here was a huge deal.
I know China has a billion people, but no way they have 40K screens.
I read some months ago that they've been building new theaters like crazy. So I'd expect those numbers to have grown significantly over the last 5 years.Quoting Wikipedia
ETA: Annnnnd ...
https://apnews.com/3557293fa36d455bac2eba603523fd2cQuoting Associated Press
http://chinafilminsider.com/headline...ovie-theaters/Quoting China Film Insider
https://www.pwccn.com/en/press-room/...pr-160617.htmlQuoting Rando Website
Last edited by Irish; 01-05-2019 at 05:09 AM.
I mean holy shit. If anyone wonders why Hollywood targets Asia, boom. My prediction continues to move forward. (In 100 years, the only US export will be entertainment. All of our resources will be used to make and sell entertainment for the world, and everyone will work for that purpose in some fashion.)
Oof. I stand corrected.
Heh, I liked this. Sure its all over the place and weird, but I was amused by it.
This is pretty much where I stand as well. This movie has no right being as entertaining as it is. Sure, a lot of it is Tom Hardy's uniquely hilarious performance (and I don't feel it was embarrassing of him to make a scene inside a fishbowl munching on a live lobster - I thought he was rocking it) but for all its flaws, Venom is also reminiscent of a time when writing and character development were a bigger part of Hollywood movies and it shows.Quoting Skitch (view post)
But, the writing and characterization is abysmal. Like, embarrassingly so.
Last 10 Movies Seen
(90+ = canonical, 80-89 = brilliant, 70-79 = strongly recommended, 60-69 = good, 50-59 = mixed, 40-49 = below average with some good points, 30-39 = poor, 20-29 = bad, 10-19 = terrible, 0-9 = soul-crushingly inept in every way)
Run (2020) 64
The Whistlers (2019) 55
Pawn (2020) 62
Matilda (1996) 37
The Town that Dreaded Sundown (1976) 61
Moby Dick (2011) 50
Soul (2020) 64
Heroic Duo (2003) 55
A Moment of Romance (1990) 61
As Tears Go By (1988) 65
Stuff at Letterboxd
Listening Habits at LastFM
Heh, on one hand, I agree the characters are inconsistent. But not more so than in other more prestigious movies. The dialogue is actually pretty fun and it cracked me up often - not only with the "turd in the wind" line. I meant more that this movie takes forty minutes to establish motivation and character that other recent blockbusters are too lazy (or too afraid to lose the younger audiences) to take. I mean, I understand something like Spider-Verse is aimed at people accustomed to YouTube videos and it must move briskly, but that movie, as fun as it is, could have used some time for feelings and situations to sink in.
This is on tv and my god...it is AWFUL.