Well, I didn't say it's not a funny film, or that it's a bad thing that Murray's character is an asshole (he's the best part of it, actually- it's just that the movie knows it, and uses him to the detriment of other factors). But if it's not going to do anything with the sexual/religious imagery, why even bring it up? Stuff like the Cardinal's visit, Ray and Winston's theological conversation, the ghost-BJ, the gatekeeper/keymaster thing, all feel blatantly allegorical to me, and yet they could've been excised and the movie wouldn't have been any worse off for it. I agree that 'depth' is a misleading term and it's not exactly lack of it that bothered me. I guess I just don't feel like Ghostbusters is anything special- it didn't particularly speak to me, and I don't feel the need to see it again.