You're going to have to prove that Barty is in his right mind. Care to put it to a vote?
Printable View
You're going to have to prove that Barty is in his right mind. Care to put it to a vote?
Hey, one was ace, two was good, three was right in between 1 and 2. And what fans feared the most, Ford's age, wasn't even a problem. And disregarding any similarities of any kind, Indy IV was still more fun than a lot of blockbusters. True, it took some effort to get over the fact that it was merely incredibly solid in the weeks afterwards, but I wasn't bored. Point is, I still feel that they can do a helluva lot better than Indy IV. I'd rather they didn't bother however if the only reason to make it is because the market demands it.
In my opinion, there's been only one film in this series worth a damn and that's the first one. I disagree with your assertion that the fourth one was at all fun, or comparatively fun or anything approaching solid. It was miserable. This is solely an opportunity for them to sell you a tired version of a known product. But hey, don't let me tell you how to spend your money.
Barty is excited for Indy 5.
Am i the only one who LOVED Last Crusade?
Last Crusade is roughly comparable to Return of the Jedi. It has its moments of excitement, but it also has a feeling of "been there, done that" and a fatal element that causes the film to be slightly irritating. Sean Connery = Ewoks.
I haven't yet worked up the desire/enthusiasm to see Indy IV, so I'm not exactly thrilled about this. I've got a feeling I'd prefer to see Spielberg doing almost any of the other projects he's had on the table for a while, if for no other reason than to see Barty's reaction to a Spielberg-helmed Lincoln biopic.
I actually haven't watched any of the Indy films in the last 8 years, save for Temple of Doom, which I saw for the first time in 2006, and hated. Like, really, really hated.
My memories tell me I liked the first and the third ones quite a bit, but I just can't be sure anymore.
The opening and last act of Temple of Doom might be my favorite Indy moments from the series.
They're definitely mine. I consider the last thirty-five minutes of Temple of Doom the pinnacle of action filmmaking. Breathlessly paced, perfectly edited, and - in the best Indy tradition - damn near hilarious.
Indy cutting the bridge at the end still stuns me. Seeing that on the big screen last year was a privilege.
I find that the Indy movies follow the Star Wars series quite well.
Raiders of the Lost Ark = Star Wars
- Fun, original yet throwbacky, iconic, the one that defines the series.
Temple of Doom = Empire Strikes Back
- Intense, epic, phenomenally Shakesperean, by far the best of the series.
Last Crusade = Return of the Jedi
- Completely agree with Spinal 100%. I was about to make the Henry Jones = Ewoks comparison when I saw that he already did. Not a bad movie, but utterly devoid of any sense of freshness. It's a meaningless sequel.
Kingdom of the Crystal Skull = Phantom Menace
- Pointless glossy effects, introduction of a new annoying character, forced inclusion of fan-favorite character, loses track of the series dynamic entirely.
So it is logical to assume that Indy V will be exactly like Attack of the Clones, most likely with a Lucas-penned angsty love story between Shia and some chick. SO EXCITED!