Maybe the film is saying that this is the natural outcome of a libertarian political takeover? :shrug:
I skipped this film, mainly because I listened to the podcast 372 pages We'll Never Get Back, and that was plenty for me.
Printable View
My friend and I agree whole-heartedly with this. The movie celebrates but also seriously underestimates gamer culture.
What D&MU says is also true to an extent. The pop culture fandom could have been used more profoundly in a way that related to the character arcs.
These two points aside I still gave this movie a Yay. Why? The visual spectacle and the choreography of incredible events is hard to beat. Any other director would have been drowned by the ambition of this movie, but Spielberg keeps both the action coherent and the storyline simple enough to be affecting at all the right moments.
I wish this film subverted more of its cliches, but perhaps its whole 80s/90s ethos is structurally designed to satisfy a quick surface-level arcade fix. It's absolutely acceptable, and there are a few instances that are legitimately interesting (the Shining restructure, which Sarah mentioned wasn't in the book in the same way), but so much of it plays at such a broad level that it never is able to transform into anything affecting. It doesn't help that the villain is so generic.
And it has at least 4 endings before it finally wraps up.
Man, if the novel is worse than the movie, I can't imagine how terrible it must be (actually I can imagine it very well from excerpts I've read online). Its worst crime is probably that the next time I watch The Shining I'll be reminded of this crap.