You guys are all weird.
I watched Ant-Man for 2nd time. Im sure Edgar Wrights version wouldve been better, but this exceded every hope I had. Its wonderful. Fantastic tone. 8.5/10
Printable View
You guys are all weird.
I watched Ant-Man for 2nd time. Im sure Edgar Wrights version wouldve been better, but this exceded every hope I had. Its wonderful. Fantastic tone. 8.5/10
Seriously Irish I apologize if you felt I was attacking you. It wasn't an attack at all I was just trying to be a (funny) smartass.
Seriously? I was the only one that knew it was joking? Wtf ya'll
Ant-Man is a weird Marvel case for me in that I am not really keen on its comedy and (especially) drama, but really like its action scenes.
I thought it was fine, I appreciated that it was reasonably low-stakes. Michael Pena worked. But the plot felt like reheated Iron Man, and felt like they rushed through the middle of the film, i.e. the development of Rudd's character, and I wasn't a fan of how they sidelined Evangeline Lilly's character during the climax. And I know it's a Marvel movie, but the inconsistency regarding the movie's world really confused me after a while. I thought Pym particles compacted mass, but then a tank keychain turns into a real tank, and Scott can somehow to go smaller than mass itself (but still "hear" his daughter). And a train toy can knock a hero over, even though that hero is, again, still a 200-lb person.
I recognize how silly that criticism is, but it's there all the same.
Also, it made Judy Greer into The Mom again, which at this point is becoming a national tragedy. Two big films last year where Judy Greer's job was to beg a hero to be responsible. Eff that noise.
Hey, in Tomorrowland she was the mom on an old videotape for one scene with nothing resembling advice or motivation!
The ever-relevant article.
Yeah, well, hmm.
Physics logic/reality is never a thing in comic book movies.
Edit: or books.
The issue isn't physics, it's internal consistency. The film sets up the rules of its world and then breaks them regularly for whatever interests it in the moment.
I admit to being pedantic, sure, but nothing would've been lost with more rigor or at least some sort of handwavey bullshit early on that adds a caveat to the film's rules.
Unconfimred but probably not true that Vincent D’Onofrio wants in Spider-man
http://www.screengeek.net/2016/05/19...an-homecoming/
I'd love to see David Fincher's Anchorman.
OoOooOoooooOOoh Brie Larson might be Captain Marvel!
Definitely a name I'd hoped they'd consider for a while now. I wonder if she was already in talks back when Whedon shot FX plates for her to show up in Age of Ultron.
First name I've heard that I've liked!
From March 2015 when it was rumoured Danvers was cast for Ultron:
I still like all of these choices, in case things with Larson don't work out at the last minute, Joaquin Phoenix-style.
EDIT: At that point in time we also hadn't seen Rogue Nation yet, so I'd now add in REBECCA FERGUSON.
Fox says Fantastic Four remains part of their "plans" (Whatever those are).
http://collider.com/fantastic-four-simon-kinberg-tone/
Updated Phase 4 predictions.
Black Widow: May 1, 2020
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 3 July 10, 2020 (Celestialsssss)
Spider-man <symbiote> Nov 6, 2020
Namor: 2021<------Thissssssssssssssss
Iron Man 4: 2021 (Mandarin Returns)
Black Panther 2: 2021
Captain Marvel 2: 2022
Inhumans: 2022
Avengers: Illuminati 2023
Dr Strange 2: 2023 (Previously Planet Hulk)
https://soundcloud.com/fatmanonbatman/fatman-129
Marvel is looking at Niki Caro (Whale Rider, McFarland, USA) and Jennifer Kent (The Babadook) as possible directors for Captain Marvel,