I'm no expert on braille on the internet, but I'm reading those three dots as "in the butt", amirite!?Quote:
Originally Posted by Thirdmango
Printable View
I'm no expert on braille on the internet, but I'm reading those three dots as "in the butt", amirite!?Quote:
Originally Posted by Thirdmango
There's a huge, huge difference between nude modelling and porn.
However, it is possible that a photo of a nude person be porn if there's no penetration or even a second party.
If a photograph features a woman using her fingers to spread her labia while suggestively sucking a lollipop, that's porn.
But Playboy or Suicide Girls is not porn. That's just nude modelling. Both are actually quite tasteful.
Intent is everything.
EDIT: I also don't see what getting paid for it has to do with whether or not it's porn.
If a couple films themselves having sex, they made a porno. And I doubt they paid each other to do it.
If they did, then damn, their lives really suck.
so we're all about proofreading the random thoughts forum huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thirdmango
Who did who in the what now?
Here you go, I think the definition of Porn is on a case by case basis. Here's my definition: (Definition is NSFW)
[]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thirdmango
I gotta say...not necessarily.
There are people out there who rub out to pretty non-pornographic stuff.
okay, how about this, we all have different definitions. "You said porn in a context I disagree with. Rabble Rabble Rabble."
Hey guys, I just had a turkey sandwich.
Now everyone discuss the semantics of what a turkey sandwich is. Go.
i locked my keys in the car for the first time today. i also broke into a car for the first time today. which is much easier than it seems like it should be, and 5 or 6 people walked past me and didn't even question the fact that i was prying my door open and shoving a coathanger into it.
Weird. I had locked myself out of my house today for the first time.Quote:
Originally Posted by ledfloyd
I had to wait for Barty to get back from Disneyland to let me in.
Start carrying a coat hanger around with you?Quote:
Originally Posted by Watashi
I think the definition of porn is quite simple. It's if some sort of sex act is taking place.Quote:
Originally Posted by Thirdmango
You guys are chodes, man.
Of course it is. Don't be stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by [ETM]
No it's not.Quote:
Originally Posted by Irish
Split hairs much? Oh, right. It's you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Qrazy
Megladon brought up a good point about intent -- but Playboy & SG are clearly strokebooks. Their primary reason for being is fapping. They don't exist for any other purpose. That's porn.
15 years of goatse and the like has warped everyone's minds. But really, you guys are making a distinction that's about hardcore pornography, which in the context of Mango's original post is ridiculous.
It's also ridiculous in a general context, because you guys are making out as if people are consuming this stuff, smoking pipes and drinking Chardonnay, while having long winded conversations about composition and lighting and "appreciating" the beauty of the human body.
Nude modeling? C'mon. If the primary purpose is to get you to lock yourself in the bathroom, drop trou & pump your junk like you're trying to start a lawnmower, that's porn.
Which is fine --- because there's also a difference between what's porn and what's obscene, which is another distinction most of you are failing to make.
Personally if there isn't at least four people, one being a midget, two barnyard animals, a gag ball, a tack hammer and a bowl of spaghetti sauce then it's not porn.
I'd call that a Tuesday nightQuote:
Originally Posted by soitgoes...
Herpaderp much? Oh right, herpaderp. Herpaderp derp DEEEEEEEEEERPPPPPPPP.Quote:
Originally Posted by Irish
[]
[]
Actually, I think Playboy is about as much porn as something like Maxim or, hell, Cigar Aficionado.
It's a pop culture magazine. I would argue that its main intent is not to provide fapping material. It's cliché to say, I know, but Playboy really does have some great writing in it.
North Americans are hella prudish about this kind of thing. In Europe boobies are pretty commonplace, and not seen as pornographic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irish
It's not, though. Not all nude modelling is meant to be fapp'd to. If you do, that's your own business.
I think we're burying the lead here. Thirdmango's friend is dressing up as a naked chipmunk. This is what we should all be focusing on.
I'm focusing on the lack of pics which I find sincerely disappointing. I mean yeah it's a pay site but if she's his friend then he should be able to score us some skins. Come on now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spinal
sounds like I'm gonna have to hook a brotha up
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thirdmango
Wait, have you actually seen the pictures?
I thought this was something you'd just like, heard.
Her facebook profile is of her as this chipmunk thing with the website logo in the bottom right corner. The company has a deviant art page, so I have seen one picture.