PDA

View Full Version : Rum Diary (Depp + Thompson) ==> trailer



Morris Schæffer
08-26-2011, 10:43 AM
abvPAjZGmEY

Kurosawa Fan
08-26-2011, 02:09 PM
That is one fantastic trailer. :lol:

number8
08-26-2011, 02:23 PM
First Johnny Depp movie I'm interested in in... how many years?

Raiders
08-26-2011, 02:33 PM
Bruce Robinson? Wow.

Watashi
08-26-2011, 05:12 PM
That really doesn't look any good at all.

Irish
08-26-2011, 05:34 PM
The book is pretty much unfilmable. Prose is good but the story is slight. Really slight. Wondering how they turned this into a movie.

number8
08-26-2011, 06:21 PM
Bruce Robinson? Wow.

Yeah, I find this kind of thing fascinating. I wonder if it's going to be a comeback of sorts.

number8
08-26-2011, 06:27 PM
The book is pretty much unfilmable. Prose is good but the story is slight. Really slight. Wondering how they turned this into a movie.

From what I heard, Depp brainstormed this movie with Thompson himself for like 10 years until he died.

bac0n
08-26-2011, 06:35 PM
I'm there. I loved Johnny Depp's turn as HST in Fear & Loathing.

ledfloyd
08-26-2011, 06:57 PM
yeah, wats is silly.

Rowland
08-26-2011, 07:01 PM
I like that Depp appears to be playing Thompson as more of an actual human being than his comparatively cartoonish portrayal from Fear and Loathing.

DavidSeven
08-26-2011, 07:19 PM
Looks sort of whatever. I love Thompson's prose, but I hate hearing it in Depp's voice-over film narration. It just doesn't have the same quality.

MadMan
08-26-2011, 07:27 PM
I don't know if this will be better than Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, but that's irrelevant considering how funny that trailer was. And I love Johnny Depp playing HST. Maybe its just me (and yes I have read Fear and Loathing-but not Rum Diary).

Qrazy
08-26-2011, 08:35 PM
I like that Depp appears to be playing Thompson as more of an actual human being than his comparatively cartoonish portrayal from Fear and Loathing.

I don't like that, I don't like that at all.

Something about the trailer for this film gives off a shallow vibe to me. It seems interested in surface qualities (the girl, luxury) rather than interested in commenting upon those qualities... which is odd coming from Robinson or Thompson. Hopefully it's just the trailer.

Grouchy
08-26-2011, 08:49 PM
Something about the trailer for this film gives off a shallow vibe to me. It seems interested in surface qualities (the girl, luxury) rather than interested in commenting upon those qualities... which is odd coming from Robinson or Thompson. Hopefully it's just the trailer.
I understand what you mean, but trailers are made to sell movies, not to describe them.

I trust this film. Or at least, I hope it's good.

Ezee E
08-26-2011, 11:03 PM
Meh....

ledfloyd
08-27-2011, 11:03 PM
I don't like that, I don't like that at all.
it's in accordance with the source material. the rum diary isn't nearly as caricaturesque as fear and loathing. it almost feels like HST riffing on hemingway.

Skitch
08-28-2011, 02:06 AM
Unfilmable? I think it may be one of the more filmable of Thompsons works.

I think some people should stick to what they do best. Lucas should work on Star Wars till he's dead. Scorcese should make mobster pictures forever. And Johnny Depp should play Hunter Thompson the rest of his life.

And I totally agree with you 8..."first Depp movie I've been interested in since..."

eternity
08-28-2011, 05:41 AM
Lizard tongues? Isn't this story drug-less?

Irish
08-28-2011, 08:52 AM
From what I heard, Depp brainstormed this movie with Thompson himself for like 10 years until he died.

That smells of PR. Have a hard time imagining Thomspon spoke about this book over the course of 10 minutes toward the end of his life, much less 10 years.

Qrazy
08-28-2011, 01:37 PM
That smells of PR. Have a hard time imagining Thomspon spoke about this book over the course of 10 minutes toward the end of his life, much less 10 years.

Well if you think it's so then it must be true!

Irish
08-28-2011, 03:17 PM
Well if you think it's so then it must be true!

Herpa derp!

Not your best effort, Q. Try again.

Spinal
08-28-2011, 04:37 PM
What's so unlikely about Depp and Thompson discussing a movie adaptation? They were friends.

Qrazy
08-28-2011, 05:01 PM
Herpa derp!

Not your best effort, Q. Try again.

http://images.wikia.com/darth/images/7/70/Moron.jpg

Qrazy
08-28-2011, 05:06 PM
But seriously, as per usual you're just talking out of your ass.

"That smells of PR. Have a hard time imagining Thomspon spoke about this book over the course of 10 minutes toward the end of his life, much less 10 years."

The book wasn't even released until 1998 so he definitely spoke about it in the last decade of his life. As to whether or not he and Depp discussed it...

Hunter S. Thompson wrote the novel The Rum Diary in 1961, but the novel was not published until 1998.[4] The independent production companies Shooting Gallery and SPi Films sought to adapt the novel into a film in 2000, and actor Johnny Depp was signed to star and to serve as executive producer. Nick Nolte was also signed to star alongside Depp.[5] The project did not move past the development stage.[4] During this stage, Hunter S. Thompson became so frustrated as to fire off an obscenity-laden letter calling the process a "waterhead fuckaround".[6]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2444/3928489501_75d5d002c0_o.jpg

Irish
08-28-2011, 06:02 PM
What's so unlikely about Depp and Thompson discussing a movie adaptation? They were friends.

Nothing. But there's a world of difference between that what 8's a post implied (I made the assumption that he was paraphrasing a source).

Saying Thompson 'brainstormed for 10 years' implies that not only does he approve of the current film but was in some way actively involved in it's production. That's what I think smells.

Irish
08-28-2011, 06:13 PM
But seriously, as per usual you're just talking out of your ass.

You're having trouble making a few distictions:

- One, the use of hyperbole for effect. We won't go into that here, but you may want to sign up for a course in English (that's E-N-G-L-I-S-H) composition at your local community college to learn more about it.

- Two, Thompson writing a letter to the producers in 2000, 2001 is a world away from 'actively brainstorming for 10 years' with one of the principals of the film.

- Three, Thompson was obviously writing the letter to the current producers. Why would he do that? Because he stood to make enormously more money on the option should the film actually get made.

- Four, your post refutes an argument I wasn't making. So who is talking out their ass again?

Ah, yes, that'd be you. But yeah, as a consolation I was really impressed you went to the effort of digging up that old mimeograph. /golfclap

Spinal
08-28-2011, 07:54 PM
Nothing. But there's a world of difference between that what 8's a post implied (I made the assumption that he was paraphrasing a source).

Saying Thompson 'brainstormed for 10 years' implies that not only does he approve of the current film but was in some way actively involved in it's production. That's what I think smells.

I still don't see what was misleading about 8's post. We all know that Thompson is dead. Thompson's 'approval' at this point is irrelevant. Few people were in a better position to know Thompson's mind than Depp. Depp is a powerful enough figure in the film world to have significant influence on production decisions. I'm missing the part where 8 makes a huge leap.

Qrazy
08-28-2011, 10:05 PM
You're having trouble making a few distictions:

- One, the use of hyperbole for effect. We won't go into that here, but you may want to sign up for a course in English (that's E-N-G-L-I-S-H) composition at your local community college to learn more about it.

- Two, Thompson writing a letter to the producers in 2000, 2001 is a world away from 'actively brainstorming for 10 years' with one of the principals of the film.

- Three, Thompson was obviously writing the letter to the current producers. Why would he do that? Because he stood to make enormously more money on the option should the film actually get made.

- Four, your post refutes an argument I wasn't making. So who is talking out their ass again?

Ah, yes, that'd be you. But yeah, as a consolation I was really impressed you went to the effort of digging up that old mimeograph. /golfclap

I responded directly to the words you wrote down and then buried you.

But for your benefit...

8 said Depp and Thompson brainstormed this movie... as in The Rum Diary. Not necessarily this particular production of the film, but certainly the source material given that they worked on an earlier production together with Depp as exec producer and Thompson taking an active approach to making the film.

Did you ever read the letter? Thompson brought Depp onto the project.

Thompson spoke about The Rum Diary both the book and film within the last decade of the film. Your point is refuted. The end.

MadMan
08-29-2011, 05:43 AM
Take this lame shit outside, yo. Stop ruining the fucking thread :|

Irish
08-29-2011, 08:46 AM
I still don't see what was misleading about 8's post. We all know that Thompson is dead. Thompson's 'approval' at this point is irrelevant. Few people were in a better position to know Thompson's mind than Depp. Depp is a powerful enough figure in the film world to have significant influence on production decisions. I'm missing the part where 8 makes a huge leap.

I disagree that it's irrelevant. There's money and credibility and authenticity in endorsements. (There's money going the other way too, like the difference in a biography written by Kitty Kelly and a biography written by David McCullough.)

Using Thompson's name in this way is a hook. It's morning talk show fodder. Given its release date, the movie is positioned to be taken seriously, so I think there's a great deal of marketing value attached to saying or implying Thompson was involved beyond a completely superficial level.

I tend to doubt the assertion because the book is slight, cast off when Thompson was young. It was published for the same reason Spielberg made Crystal Skull, Joseph Heller wrote a sequel to Catch 22, and Kurt Vonnegut shat out Time Quake in the sunset of their careers. For the money.

Given Thompson's health and state of mind during the last few years of his life, I have a lot of trouble believing that he paid much mind to this early work, one that he was so unconcerned with that he let it go unpunished and unread for over twenty five years. That doesn't seem to be the actions of someone who would be so creatively concerned with it that he'd "brainstorm for 10 years" over the movie.

Irish
08-29-2011, 08:57 AM
Did you ever read the letter?

"If you people don't want to do anything then cough up the option & I'll talk to someone else."

That's the most substantive part of his rant and outside of attributing the role of quasi-producer to himself, it shows you where his real interest lies. They don't make the movie, Thompson doesn't get the back end of the option. Period, end of story.

number8
08-29-2011, 11:57 AM
I don't understand. They were good friends. They hung out together a lot. One was making a movie based on his friend's story. I would think the ridiculous thing would be to assume they DIDN'T talk about the movie a lot.

Skitch
08-30-2011, 01:50 AM
I picked up Thompson's ashes and used a Ouija board to ask him what he thought. He said to chill out.

MadMan
08-30-2011, 08:14 PM
I picked up Thompson's ashes and used a Ouija board to ask him what he thought. He said to chill out.I bet he also told you to smoke his secret stash hidden behind the piano.